Question: "You discusses Eluana Englaro or an institutional coup? "
Excuse the irony ritenetemi not a monster, a being insensitive, but Moses wanted .. you'd need to split the cases linked to a story, producing a totally different consequences, and then sink a cynical "Nano 4th level of evil" in the bowels of the 'abyss .
of what and who I'm talking about?
living will!
institutional crisis Berlusconi / Napolitano !
undue interference of the "evil of Nano 4 level" that Pope Benedict XVI .
• To what concerns the first question, that is, living wills, the two terms tend to justify, only in this direction, the intrusion of politics in the Italian case Englaro . In fact, if on the one hand it is known that even if not textually required by our Constitution "the right to life" is placed in defense of the fundamental interest of the human person to his physical existence, the other to the case of Euthanasia is hotly debated, production of two options: "with the consent of the natural and legal capacity to act and refused aggressive treatment, so that the failure of curative medicine, is not only legitimate, but simply need .. and the lack of a consent due a fatal disease in modern times from the go-zealous' treatment.
In these terms should come into play on living wills, which recognizes the binding effect on the statements made previously by the patient's will or not be subject to medical treatment aimed at prolonging life, on which current and former legislators have not yet expressed any legislative intervention.
In this vein, the Decree Law sponsored by the CDM (as well as statements by the same senseless idiot in office or Berlusconi) does not appear suited to solve a dilemma of major importance both in view of the Italian legal system, both in the social, missing assumptions essential as provided in Article 77 the Constitution or the extraordinary, the necessity and urgency of the case under consideration, and the emergence of an offense that tends to arise in that order by a superior condition, but does not permit a sentence of the res judicata Supreme Court authorizing him to stop feeding.
• To what concerns the crisis Berlusconi and Napolitano of real institutional crisis one can not speak, as the President of the Republic, perhaps for the first time adopted the role of guarantor of the constitutional text. If anything, the crisis is to frame the will of the moment or dell'idiota Berlusconi nell’andare a modificare la Carta Costituzionale eccessivamente sovietica, e nelle più astute e non etiche mosse politiche si fa gioco non del caso Englaro ma della persona Eluana Englaro , e del “nano malefico di 4 livello”, mostrando una prostrazione tesa al lecchinaggio e sorretta dal motto “Dio sia con noi” o “Dio salvi L’Italia” che è solo strumentale ai suoi interessi. Una visuale eccessivamente squallida che non da atto a nessuna via di redenzione nonostante gli sforzi dell’idiota di turno ovvero Berlusconi .
· Indebita intromissione del “Nano 4 level of evil "is ricondurrebbe the argument that the Constitution guarantees the inevitability of national jurisdiction, that is to say that even a pope can change the sentences of an Italian court, playing in his favor the element Berlusconi, to win a different interest than love for life or for God, what is past, but only to regain credibility, now in crisis, where the story of "rehabilitation" of the bishops linked to Lefebrve proved a boomerang, of enormous dimensions.
The Italian market has not betrayed the tradition of Italian politics, ecclesiastical .. everything was consumed in more traditional rituals, and that has not surprised anyone, in the jumble of modern democracy subverted the political, moral, interests enter the big media blender, boosting primarily cultural poverty of our country. There is no remedy to recover a government policy that there is ...
And finally alone remains Eluana murderess and a father for the Vatican .. and a father who wants to get rid of his daughter for Berlusca .. This is too easy .. too!
Mary!
0 comments:
Post a Comment